Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 3675 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 77% better in FIFA 23 than Phenom X4 9550 - 140 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $185.0 vs $189.95
- Up to 45% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Phenom X4 9550 - $1.32 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15212 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Agena | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |