Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 4417 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $189.95 vs $260.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.78 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Phenom X4 9550 - 281 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
245
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13746 minutes ago
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |