Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 575 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 90 vs 85 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $188.95 vs $255.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i9-10900KF - $2.22 vs $2.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
85
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |