Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4508 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Phenom II X4 830 - 135 vs 116 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |