Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 2334 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 810 - 122 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 91 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
