Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 297 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 132 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 91 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
