Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 794 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4800MQ - 175 vs 165 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 47 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 91 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
