Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $185.0 vs $420.65
- Up to 46% better value when playing New World than Core i9-9900 - $1.89 vs $3.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 21% better in New World than FX-8350 - 119 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for $420.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |