Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $185.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900F - $0.89 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield V than FX-8350 - 279 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18509 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
57%
Price, $
$432.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |