Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320E vs Pentium Gold G6405

FX-8320E vs Pentium Gold G6405: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 26 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Pentium Gold G6405

4.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Logo
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 4.1GHz 4MB Desktop Processor Boxed

Buy for $91.65 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 25 minutes ago

AMD FX-8320E

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD FX-8320E Logo
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 26 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Pentium Gold G6405

4.1 GHz | 2-core

Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Logo
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 4.1GHz 4MB Desktop Processor Boxed

Buy for $91.65 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 25 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320E

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads

Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405

  • Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320E - 130 vs 127 FPS
  • Up to 49% cheaper than FX-8320E - $91.65 vs $178.02
  • Up to 49% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320E - $0.71 vs $1.4 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 58 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.
The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

127

97%

Value, $/FPS

$1.4/FPS

50%

Price, $

$178.02

51%

AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK

Buy for $178.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 26 minutes ago

Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Logo
Pentium Gold G6405

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

130

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.71/FPS

100%

Price, $

$91.65

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Pentium Gold G6405 4.1GHz 4MB Desktop Processor Boxed

Buy for $91.65 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 25 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Logo
Pentium Gold G6405

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo
FX-8320E

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

443

52%

Multi-Core

1680

95%

Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Logo
Pentium Gold G6405

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

848

100%

Multi-Core

1760

100%

AMD FX-8320E Logo

AMD FX-8320E

vs
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 Logo

Intel Pentium Gold G6405

Sep 2nd, 2014Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
FXCollectionPentium Gold
VisheraCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8
Cores2
8
Threads4
3.2 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.1 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
95 WTDP
58 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
41.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.