Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2681 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $178.02 vs $432.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-12900F - $0.26 vs $0.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Valorant than FX-8320E - 921 vs 683 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
921
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
55%
Price, $
$432.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |