Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 1332 days older than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $178.02 vs $269.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-2500K - $0.35 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than FX-8320E - 510 vs 504 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
504
98.82352941176471%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60980 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
510
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
66.0377358490566%
Price, $
$269.99
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |