Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $178.02 vs $281.23
- Up to 23% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.65 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 22% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320E - 334 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
334
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
77%
Price, $
$281.23
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $281.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |