Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1389 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $64.03 vs $180.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i7-6700K - $0.35 vs $0.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8150 - 211 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3361 minutes ago
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |