Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $82.02 vs $379.54
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 26% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 139 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75647 minutes ago
Buy for $379.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75647 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |