Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $39.99 vs $250.26
- Up to 83% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-9700 - $0.34 vs $2.02 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-8120 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1852 minutes ago
Buy for $250.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |