Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3758 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $78.02 vs $265.49
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700 - $0.68 vs $1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8120 - 148 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
37%
Price, $
$265.49
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |