Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 239 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 59% cheaper than FX-6350 - $40.99 vs $99.99
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Buy for $40.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |