Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $58.02 vs $587.46
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-9920X - $0.35 vs $2.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Dota 2 than FX-6300 - 204 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |