Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1632 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4590 - 128 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $79.0 vs $587.46
- Up to 86% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9920X - $0.65 vs $4.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.59/FPS
14%
Price, $
$587.46
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |