Key Differences
In short — Core i7-920 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-920 is 1059 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6100 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |