Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 233 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - $29.65 vs $69.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6100 - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |