Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 234 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - $29.65 vs $49.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |