Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-4300 - $29.65 vs $48.02
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6100 - 229 vs 228 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |