Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6100 - 98 vs 97 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-4300 - $29.65 vs $48.02
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75056 minutes ago
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |