Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 57 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 88% cheaper than FX-8350 - $22.92 vs $185.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-8350 - $0.04 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than FX-4130 - 603 vs 595 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3754 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |