Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 377 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4100 - 229 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |