Buy on Amazon
$99.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1436 days newer than Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6700T - 405 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 35 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
404
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
