Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 267 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than EPYC 7742 - 135 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |