Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1025 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 85 vs 180 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Naples | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
