Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4710HQ outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4710HQ is 1185 days older than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7551 - 179 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Naples | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
