Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 2949 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Core i7-950 - 172 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 130 vs 180 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Naples | Codename | Bloomfield |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
