Buy on Amazon
$99.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 667 days older than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7551 - 169 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8617 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Naples | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
