The Radeon R9 Nano is at least much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 175 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
69%
Min 1% FPS
37
64%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$209.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$239.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
84%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
84%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
