Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 2603 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 175 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than Radeon R9 Nano - 740 vs 606 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
740
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$277.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $277.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7378 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 Nano | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$649 | MSRP | $289 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |