The Arc A750 is a clear winner – it's a 2x or more times faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $57.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Arc A750
- A 2x or more times faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560
- A better value for money when playing games compared to the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than the Radeon RX 560 – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 21% cheaper than the Arc A750 – $214.99 vs $271.99
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than the Arc A750 – 75 vs 225 Watts
Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
$271.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$329.57
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$309.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$616.93
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$344.58
In Stock
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
43%
Min 1% FPS
23
32%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.13/FPS
54%
Buy on Amazon
$214.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$184.90
In Stock
Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
15%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A750 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
$289.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
225 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
268.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
537.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
17.2 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |