The Radeon R9 Nano is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 125 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
89%
Min 1% FPS
37
86%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$241.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
61%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
