The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 175 vs 360 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5080
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 5080 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
34%
Min 1% FPS
37
27%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5080
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
214
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$1974
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$1,974.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,384.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,189.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,079.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 5080 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 5080 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 5080 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
53%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
15%
GeForce RTX 5080
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
960 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
335 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
879.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
56.28 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5080 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 360 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 960 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 335 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 879.3 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 56.28 TFLOPS |