The Radeon R9 Nano is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6500 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6500 XT
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 107 vs 175 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6500 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
97%
Min 1% FPS
37
97%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$246.43
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$159.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6500 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
143.9 GB/s
28%
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
5.765 TFLOPS
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 107 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 90.08 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 180.2 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.765 TFLOPS |