The Radeon R9 Nano is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 175 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
86%
Min 1% FPS
37
82%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
67%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
67%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
67%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
94%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
