The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $187.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Arc A770 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 24% cheaper – $598.99 vs $786.96
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 2% less energy – 225 vs 230 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
66%
Min 1% FPS
45
60%
Price, $
$786.96
76%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
50%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, $
$598.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.67/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$598.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
94%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
63%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $1,599.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 230 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 16 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 2048-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
