The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4060. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
The GeForce RTX 4060 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4060
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 115 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4060 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
65%
Min 1% FPS
37
59%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4060
May 18th, 2023
Average FPS
111
100%
Min 1% FPS
63
100%
Price, $
$485.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.37/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$485.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$499.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$491.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$469.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4060 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4060 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4060 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
54%
GeForce RTX 4060
May 18th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
53%
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
92%
FP32
15.11 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4060 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 272 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 118.1 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 236.2 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 15.11 TFLOPS |