In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 240 is much slower than the Radeon Vega 8 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $284 cheaper!
Radeon R7 240
- Up to 77% cheaper – $85.99 vs $370.00
- Up to 77% cheaper
Radeon Vega 8
- Up to 2700% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 28 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 2700% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 85% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $13.21 vs $85.99/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 15 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Vega 8: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
4%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$85.99/FPS
15%
Radeon Vega 8
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
28 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$370
23%
Value, $/FPS
$13.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Vega 8: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon Vega 8: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
35%
Radeon Vega 8
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
10 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
40 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.28 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 240 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon Vega 8 Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $69.00 | MSRP | – |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | Vega IGP (Picasso) |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
