In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 240 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 5050 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $164 cheaper!
Radeon R7 240
- Up to 66% cheaper – $85.99 vs $249.99
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 30 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
GeForce RTX 5050
- Up to 12500% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 126 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 12500% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jul 01, 2025 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 98% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $1.98 vs $85.99/FPS
- Up to 98% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce RTX 5050: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
2%
Price, $
$85.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$85.99/FPS
2%
GeForce RTX 5050
Jul 1st, 2025
Average FPS
126 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce RTX 5050: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce RTX 5050: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
3%
GeForce RTX 5050
Jul 1st, 2025
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
82.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
205.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 240 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 5050 Jul 1st, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Jul 1st, 2025 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
