In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 240 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 5090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $3274 cheaper!
Radeon R7 240
- Up to 97% cheaper – $85.99 vs $3359.99
- Up to 97% cheaper
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 30 vs 575 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
GeForce RTX 5090
- Up to 27700% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 278 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 27700% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Jan 30, 2025 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 86% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $12.08 vs $85.99/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 2 GB
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
0%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$85.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$85.99/FPS
14%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
198 FPS
100%
Price, $
$3359.99
2%
Value, $/FPS
$12.08/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
0%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1636.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 240 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 Jan 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 30th, 2025 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
