In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 240 is much slower than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $194 cheaper!
Radeon R7 240
- Up to 69% cheaper – $85.99 vs $279.99
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 16200% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 163 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 16200% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 9 years and 3 days newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 days newer
- Up to 98% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $1.71 vs $85.99/FPS
- Up to 98% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 240 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$85.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$85.99/FPS
2%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
163 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
30%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 240 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 240 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
14%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
2%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 240 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
