In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 240 is much slower than the GeForce GTX 980 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $224 cheaper!
Radeon R7 240
- Up to 72% cheaper – $85.99 vs $309.83
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 30 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
GeForce GTX 980
- Up to 7100% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 72 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7100% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 11 months and 11 days newer – Sep 19, 2014 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 11 months and 11 days newer
- Up to 95% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $4.30 vs $85.99/FPS
- Up to 95% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 980: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
3%
Price, $
$85.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$85.99/FPS
5%
GeForce GTX 980
Sep 19th, 2014
Average FPS
72 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
29 FPS
100%
Price, $
$309.83
27%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 980: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 980: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
9%
GeForce GTX 980
Sep 19th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
77.82 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
155.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.981 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 240 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Sep 19th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Sep 19th, 2014 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
