Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 960M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 167 days newer than GeForce GTX 960M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 70% better in God of War than GeForce GTX 960M - 51 vs 30 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 960M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 960M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
18.82 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
47.04 GTexel/s
18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1097 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1176 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
