Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 393 days older than GeForce GTX 960M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 960M - 39 vs 38 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 960M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 960M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
18.82 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
47.04 GTexel/s
79%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1097 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1176 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
