Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 834 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 23 than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 184 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 36% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $145.83 vs $226.72
- Up to 28% better value when playing F1 23 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $0.88 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
71%
Price, $
$226.72
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15176 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
FPS
166
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |